Profiles

Top Tips

Senior Leadership Team - School Groups

Inform strategic improvement plans
Inform discussions with school reading and SEND leaders
Prioritise training and resources

Read top tips >

Reading / Literacy Leader

Understand the strengths and challenges of learners at a group level
Prioritise training and resources
Gather evidence to inform decisions associated with curriculum support and interventions

Read top tips >

Teacher

Understand strengths and challengers of learners
Make adaptations to universal learning design
Implement strategies to support individuals

Read top tips >

SEND Leaders

Implement strategies to support individual students
Identify ‘at risk’ students who may have reading challenges in either word reading, comprehension or both

Read top tips >

Students

Students can understand their strengths and challenges to take ownership of their learning

Read top tips >

Glossary

Standard Age Score.

Use this to understand how your students are performing against the standardised sample.

It is important to understand that scores between 89 - 111 are within the average range and that if a student scores within this range on each NGRT assessment then they are performing as expected for their age.

Stanine or ‘standard nine’.

This breaks the SAS scores into nine groups to make the group level scores easier to analyse.

Use stanines to group students across a cohort when planning in next steps and monitoring which students are in line, below or above age related expectations.

The NGRT assessment is broken into two parts: Sentence Completion and Passage Comprehension – you will get a stanine for both parts. We have based the Reading Support Quadrant on this.

Reading age demonstrates a student’s ability in terms of the average of others at that age.

They are derived from the raw score at different age points.

Reading Ages tell us about the reading ability of a single child and a single point in time.

They are not useful when monitoring progress as the rate learners progress with their reading varies, meaning you cannot genuinely report monthly progress. A child at age 6 will expect to progress at a much faster rate than a child aged 12 for example.

National Percentile Rank.

The NPR ranks a learner’s performance against others in the representative sample and is used to show the percentage of individuals from within that sample, who scored equal to, or less than the learner’s particular score.

A student with an NPR of 50 means they are scoring as positively as 50% of the standardised national sample.

FAQs

Effective provision should be well-matched to a student's individual strengths and challenges. The appropriate next steps for one student may be very different to another – colleagues should adjust, or 'graduate' provision in order to personalise adaptations and/or interventions to suit their needs. In some settings this may be referred to with other terminology such as 'waves' or 'tiers' of support (for example) – the intentions are the same.

Prior to the implementation of adjustments or interventions it is helpful to determine the anticipated outcomes of such support and how these outcomes might be measured. In some instances, these may be monitored by way of teacher observations or skills development, but in others this could involve pre- and post-intervention testing which might include the use of standardised tests. NGRT can be used termly, and a progress report can be used to analyse impact. Similarly, YARC (Forms A & B) could be used to provide a detailed profile before and after the intervention.

Evidence-based interventions are used to help students close gaps and to improve skills in reading. In many cases these interventions have the desired outcomes, leading to students being back on track with their peers. However, for some students, even a skilfully delivered intervention may not help them to overcome specific challenges – more specialist support may be required. We might describe these students as 'resistant' to intervention.

Identifying barriers to learning is a process that takes time and requires a range of information and data (both qualitative and quantitative) to build a detailed profile of need. We would recommend talking with as many stakeholders as possible to consider context when making decisions related to a student's strengths and challenges and to determine the most appropriate screener(s) to use to investigate these. The needs of each student (and school) will be different—establish if there are particular types of needs that are common within your setting and prioritise these as a place to start.

Top Tips for SEND Leaders

Work with other stakeholders like your reading lead or pastoral teams to review individual profiles of strength and challenge. Are you confident the right level of support is in place for reading with these students?
Run an individual NGRT report to understand performance. Use the narrative in the Reader Profile Summary and Teaching and Learning Implications to support a deep understanding of strengths and challenges.
Work with your reading lead to identify students with known learning challenges and share information about existing support.
Are there any learners with undetected reading difficulties you can support?
- Consider results with any wider contextual evidence to spot early flags
- Prioritise further investigations through using our SEND Guide
Triangulate your NGRT data with results from other assessments, such as CAT4 to gain insights from combining ability, attainment and attitudinal data

Anna

Dhanesh

Michel

Charlotte

Kaia

Anisha

Muhammed

Finn

Rhian

Sam

Senior Leadership Team - School Groups

Reading / Literacy Leader

Teacher

SEND Leaders

Students

SAS

Stanine

Reading Age

NPR

What is a Graduated Response Model?

How can I review the impact of intervention?

What does it mean if a student is ‘resistant’ to intervention?

What factors should I consider when exploring the SEND guide?

Top Tips for SEND Leaders